Creationists Right About Entropy
Posted by keelynet on May 5, 2010
Evolutionists argue that the scientific law of entropy (the tendency of matter to go towards disorder rather than greater order) doesn’t contradict evolutionary theory because they claim the law of entropy doesn’t apply in open systems such as our Earth.
Evolutionists will use examples such as a seed becoming a tree as an argument that entropy doesn’t apply in open systems. Evolutionists are wrong on both counts for reasons which will be fully explained in this article. Entropy does occur in open systems.
We discovered entropy here on Earth which is an open system in relation to the Sun. However, entropy applies only to spontaneous or chance processes. The spontaneous (unaided or undirected) tendency of matter is always towards greater disorder — not towards greater order and complexity as evolution would teach.
Just having enough energy from the Sun is not sufficient to overcome entropy. This tendency towards disorder, which exists in all matter, can be overcome temporarily only if there exists some energy converting and directing mechanism.
The question for evolutionists is how did biological life and order on earth come into existence in the first place when there was no directing code and mechanism in nature for overcoming entropy.
The only rational answer is that an intelligent power outside of nature was responsible for the original order. Evolutionists teach that matter has an innate tendency to evolve towards greater and greater complexity or order.
We are so accustomed to seeing evolution of technology all about us (new cars, boats, ships, inventions, etc.) that we assume that Nature must work the same way also. Of course, we forget that all those new gadgets and technology had a human designer behind them. Nature, however, does not work the same way.
Even the scientific followers of Prigogine, the father of Chaos theory, have admitted that only a very minimal level of order will ever be possible as a result of spontaneous or chance processes. Considering the enormous complexity of life, it is much more logical to believe that the genetic and biological similarities between all species are due to a common Designer rather than common biological ancestry.
It is only logical that the great Designer would design similar functions for similar purposes and different functions for different purposes in all of the various forms of life. Contrary to popular belief, scientists have never created life in the laboratory.
What scientists have done is genetically alter or engineer already existing forms of life, and by doing this scientists have been able to produce new forms of life. However, they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even if scientists ever do produce life from non-living matter it won’t be by chance so it still wouldn’t help support any argument for evolution. – Full Article Source
This entry was posted on May 5, 2010 at 1:59 am and is filed under Alternative Science, Computer Related, Ecology / Earth Science, energy, Free Energy, Gee Willikers!!!, Gravity Control, Health, Invention, Mexico, Miscellaneous, Orthodox Science, Personal Anecdotes, Politics, space. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.