<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The KeelyNet Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keelynet.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Free Energy, Gravity Control, Alternative Health and Science and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cleaning and Restoring Yellowed Plastic by kstrnka</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/cleaning-and-restoring-yellowed-plastic/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kstrnka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=3332#comment-1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tried this on a 10in long clear (pliable) plastic Halloween skeleton that had yellowed over the years and I was going to throw it out.  Being that it was small scale and dispensable, I just put the item in a zip-lock bag and squirted hydrogen peroxide in.  I added a pinch of Oxy powder but when it didn&#039;t foam up I added a couple more pinches.  It was more than was recommended but I figured my peroxide was old. 
I left a small part of the zip-top open and left it out in the sun.  No noticeable change the first day but the second day I was amazed at how the yellowing was disappearing and leaving the plastic still clear! 
I&#039;m on the third day and it&#039;s dark and cloudy outside but I am thoroughly impressed! 
I am sorry I did not take any before and after pictures!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried this on a 10in long clear (pliable) plastic Halloween skeleton that had yellowed over the years and I was going to throw it out.  Being that it was small scale and dispensable, I just put the item in a zip-lock bag and squirted hydrogen peroxide in.  I added a pinch of Oxy powder but when it didn&#8217;t foam up I added a couple more pinches.  It was more than was recommended but I figured my peroxide was old.<br />
I left a small part of the zip-top open and left it out in the sun.  No noticeable change the first day but the second day I was amazed at how the yellowing was disappearing and leaving the plastic still clear!<br />
I&#8217;m on the third day and it&#8217;s dark and cloudy outside but I am thoroughly impressed!<br />
I am sorry I did not take any before and after pictures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GasHole film Hints at 100mpg patent from 1946 by Twisted Politix</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/gashole-film-hints-at-100mpg-patent-from-1946/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twisted Politix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=1234#comment-1436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, PLEASE do notify everyone if you find the patent.  There is plenty of room for you all to make money but we should all be thinking of the greater good of the WORLD at this point.  In case you are not aware of it, the USA does go to WAR to protect its oil interests (see Carter Doctrine for explicit presidential confirmation) and the peak oil movement and climate change movement are gaining steam because of the current situation.  

Can&#039;t the film producers make the details available? They showed the patent paperwork in the film.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, PLEASE do notify everyone if you find the patent.  There is plenty of room for you all to make money but we should all be thinking of the greater good of the WORLD at this point.  In case you are not aware of it, the USA does go to WAR to protect its oil interests (see Carter Doctrine for explicit presidential confirmation) and the peak oil movement and climate change movement are gaining steam because of the current situation.  </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t the film producers make the details available? They showed the patent paperwork in the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stopping Cars with Microwaves by Forteana and Failing Cars &#124; Mysterious Universe</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/stopping-cars-with-microwaves/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forteana and Failing Cars &#124; Mysterious Universe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/stopping-cars-with-microwaves/#comment-1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] today, we have the technology to disable &#8211; or to, at least, significantly affect &#8211; car-engines and their internal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today, we have the technology to disable &#8211; or to, at least, significantly affect &#8211; car-engines and their internal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clearing the Gulf Spill with Harmonics by Solfeggio Harmonics &#8211; 417 HZ &#8211; Transmutation &#124; Enjoy the power of life</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/02/clearing-the-gulf-spill-with-harmonics/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solfeggio Harmonics &#8211; 417 HZ &#8211; Transmutation &#124; Enjoy the power of life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=4521#comment-1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Clearing the Gulf Spill with Harmonics « The KeelyNet Blog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clearing the Gulf Spill with Harmonics « The KeelyNet Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Want to live Forever? 1987 Patent to keep your Head Alive by WNBC Time Machine &#8211; Oct 7, 1987 &#8211; Dale Parsons &#8211; Pt 1 &#124; Message to the board</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/20/want-to-live-forever-1987-patent-to-keep-your-head-alive/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WNBC Time Machine &#8211; Oct 7, 1987 &#8211; Dale Parsons &#8211; Pt 1 &#124; Message to the board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=4565#comment-1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Want to live Forever? 1987 Patent to keep your Head Alive « The &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Want to live Forever? 1987 Patent to keep your Head Alive « The &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Math doesn&#8217;t back it up&#8230; by The Promise of Fusion: Energy Miracle or Mirage? &#171; The KeelyNet Blog</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/the-math-doesnt-back-it-up/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Promise of Fusion: Energy Miracle or Mirage? &#171; The KeelyNet Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=4590#comment-1393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for one idealistic chance or millions for MANY CHANCES&#8230;Think about it. A prime example and WHY we WOULD do it! &#8211; JWD) - Full Article [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for one idealistic chance or millions for MANY CHANCES&#8230;Think about it. A prime example and WHY we WOULD do it! &#8211; JWD) &#8211; Full Article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Math doesn&#8217;t back it up&#8230; by hydrogen peroxide</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/the-math-doesnt-back-it-up/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hydrogen peroxide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=4590#comment-1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;hydrogen peroxide...&lt;/strong&gt;

. There is one company that has used hydrogen peroxide as a sterilizer to use in hospitals including patient rooms, surgical and other medical equipment,...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>hydrogen peroxide&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>. There is one company that has used hydrogen peroxide as a sterilizer to use in hospitals including patient rooms, surgical and other medical equipment,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invasion through Belief by Tweets that mention Invasion through Belief « The KeelyNet Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/26/invasion-through-belief/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Invasion through Belief « The KeelyNet Blog -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=4609#comment-1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jerry Decker, Eva Miranda. Eva Miranda said: Invasion through Belief « The KeelyNet Blog: Luke: Just a pilgrim, the first of many that will follow, we could ... http://bit.ly/goNNHL [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jerry Decker, Eva Miranda. Eva Miranda said: Invasion through Belief « The KeelyNet Blog: Luke: Just a pilgrim, the first of many that will follow, we could &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/goNNHL" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/goNNHL</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invasion through Belief by &#8220;gary busey&#8221;: Gawker.TV: The Five Best Videos Ever of the Day [Clipjob] &#124; RedHotNews.org</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/26/invasion-through-belief/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;gary busey&#8221;: Gawker.TV: The Five Best Videos Ever of the Day [Clipjob] &#124; RedHotNews.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 05:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=4609#comment-1389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Invasion through Belief « The KeelyNet Blog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Invasion through Belief « The KeelyNet Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Math doesn&#8217;t back it up&#8230; by keelynet</title>
		<link>http://keelynet.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/the-math-doesnt-back-it-up/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keelynet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keelynet.wordpress.com/?p=4590#comment-1388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t believe you didn&#039;t understand it. When dealing with anomalous phenomena, we have to BUILD IT to find the correct design as in;

&quot;Well, DUH…you have to build it and rebuild it as necessary until you hit on that special geometry and effect that goes beyond understood physics. Once you get that, DON’T SCREW WITH IT. Don’t try to take it apart or tweak anything. Use it as a MODEL to build another one that works the same and with that one you can analyze and tweak and even scale up.&quot;

As clearly stated, once we have spent the time with experiments to find that one working pattern, then we can try to replicate and use those versions to STUDY the EFFECT and learn what is actually happening. What twist on natural laws is being applied? Or is it some new law that we have stumbled onto?

The point was that we have all these clues and reports of fascinating machines and discoveries, but never do they seem to make it to practical applications and sales. Why, because the effects produced simply can&#039;t be possible based on using accepted and understood rules of behavior that RELY on linear processes. 

It is realizing that we are in unknown, uncharted waters because these devices most likely use non-linear behavior and so can&#039;t be predicted using standard ideas and theories...what some call &#039;thinking outside of the box&#039;. 

Science methodology still appies, we have a theory, we come up wth a hypothesis based on our current understanding and try to prove it by empirical observation.

&quot;The scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.&quot;

The entire article focuses on trying to predict anomalous phenomena using pure calculations BASED on linear processes which simply won&#039;t support the claimed effects. HOWEVER, taking into account NON-LINEAR processes, it is quite possible we might discover a unique variation of standard physics OR maybe a new effect which uses a new, undiscovered law.

I don&#039;t care whether its some unique combination of existing laws or a new law, if we don&#039;t try to build it and test it, basing our actions solely on calculations, we will be missing countless new discoveries that could lead to new, novel technologies.  

If investors are relying solely on engineering calculations based on linear processes,  to decide whether to fund a project, they are completely missing the boat since ONLY BY BUILDING IT can we even begin to succeed with a working device. And from that untouched pristine model, we should be able to duplicate the anomaly for study and eventual practical application.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t believe you didn&#8217;t understand it. When dealing with anomalous phenomena, we have to BUILD IT to find the correct design as in;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, DUH…you have to build it and rebuild it as necessary until you hit on that special geometry and effect that goes beyond understood physics. Once you get that, DON’T SCREW WITH IT. Don’t try to take it apart or tweak anything. Use it as a MODEL to build another one that works the same and with that one you can analyze and tweak and even scale up.&#8221;</p>
<p>As clearly stated, once we have spent the time with experiments to find that one working pattern, then we can try to replicate and use those versions to STUDY the EFFECT and learn what is actually happening. What twist on natural laws is being applied? Or is it some new law that we have stumbled onto?</p>
<p>The point was that we have all these clues and reports of fascinating machines and discoveries, but never do they seem to make it to practical applications and sales. Why, because the effects produced simply can&#8217;t be possible based on using accepted and understood rules of behavior that RELY on linear processes. </p>
<p>It is realizing that we are in unknown, uncharted waters because these devices most likely use non-linear behavior and so can&#8217;t be predicted using standard ideas and theories&#8230;what some call &#8216;thinking outside of the box&#8217;. </p>
<p>Science methodology still appies, we have a theory, we come up wth a hypothesis based on our current understanding and try to prove it by empirical observation.</p>
<p>&#8220;The scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.&#8221;</p>
<p>The entire article focuses on trying to predict anomalous phenomena using pure calculations BASED on linear processes which simply won&#8217;t support the claimed effects. HOWEVER, taking into account NON-LINEAR processes, it is quite possible we might discover a unique variation of standard physics OR maybe a new effect which uses a new, undiscovered law.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care whether its some unique combination of existing laws or a new law, if we don&#8217;t try to build it and test it, basing our actions solely on calculations, we will be missing countless new discoveries that could lead to new, novel technologies.  </p>
<p>If investors are relying solely on engineering calculations based on linear processes,  to decide whether to fund a project, they are completely missing the boat since ONLY BY BUILDING IT can we even begin to succeed with a working device. And from that untouched pristine model, we should be able to duplicate the anomaly for study and eventual practical application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
